Legal Opinion
Chang v. Little Monster LLC
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided July 14, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00847Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 HONG CHANG, Case No. 2:22-cv-00847-RSM 9 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 11 v. 12 LITTLE MONSTER LLC dba DL BBQ, 13 ZHAOWEI DING, WA FAN TUAN INC., CHOWBUS, INC., and HUNGRYPANDA 14 US INC., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant WA Fan Tuan, Inc. (“Fan Tuan”)’s 19 Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. #37. Fan Tuan argues that Plaintiff Hong Chang cannot 20 pursue his Lanham Act claim because he has failed to present evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, As Receiver v. O'melveny & MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Daryl Crane Pamela Crane v. Conoco, Inc., a Corporation, and Nunnallee-Cantwell, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.