Legal Opinion

Pinnix v. . Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs, beneficiary and trustee under a junior mortgage or deed of trust, brought this action to restrain the foreclosure of a senior mortgage having a lien on the same lands, and to have ascertained the amount due on the note secured by the senior mortgage, to the end that it might be paid in protection of plaintiffs' security, and plaintiffs subrogated to the rights of the senior mortgagee.

The controversy as to the amount due arises on the following facts and contentions:

On 15 April, 1927, John M. Pinnix and Madye Leak Pinnix borrowed $10,000 from the Carolina Mortgage Company, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cole v. Industrial Fibre Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Ripple v. Mortgage & Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Glenn v. Farmer's Bank of North CarolinaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  4. Ward v. . SuggSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  5. Ector v. OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gaston-Lincoln Transit, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Focus Investment Associates, Inc. v. American Title Insurance Company, Focus Investment Associates, Inc. v. American Title Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. Carolina Cooling & Heating, Inc. v. BlackburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Focus v. AmericanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. Focus v. AmericanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API