Legal Opinion

Rottinghaus v. Howell

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 21, 1983No. 4521-8-IIIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoe, C.J.

This case involves an action brought by 10 plaintiff potato growers against a seed potato grower (defendant Howell); two distributors who cut, treated and sold the seed to plaintiffs (defendants Mojonnier & Sons, Inc., and Western Cold Storage Co., Inc., hereinafter Mojonnier and Western); and a nonprofit corporation charged with administering rules and regulations of a potato seed certification program (defendant Montana Potato Improvement Association, hereinafter MPIA).

In 1977, Howell produced seed potatoes which were certified by MPIA as Montana Blue Tag Certified Russet Burbank Seed. In…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Schroeder v. Fageol Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. MarkWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Rasor v. Retail Credit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Codd v. Stevens Pass, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  2. Wright v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Palmer G. Lewis Co. v. ARCO Chemical Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Potter v. Wilbur-Ellis Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  5. Western Recreational Vehicles, Inc. v. Swift Adhesives, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API