Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Township of Watertown

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Clinton. (V. IT. Smith, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

This is an action in assumpsit brought to recover back money paid by the plaintiff to the township treasurer for taxes' claimed to have been illegally assessed against plaintiff for the year 1879. The declaration was upon the common counts, with a bill of particulars specify*377ing that the action was brought to recover $66.72, and interest at seven per cent, from January 1, 1880, received of plaintiff, claimed to be taxes assessed and collected of plaintiff for the year 1879. The defendant pleaded the general issue. The cause was tried before the court without a jury, who made a special finding…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clark v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Warren v. City of Grand HavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Silsbee v. StockleMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. City of Grand Rapids v. BlakelyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Hogelskamp v. WeeksMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Curtis v. Township of RichlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Canfield Salt & Lumber Co. v. Township of ManisteeMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Powers v. RockwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Township of Coe v. School District No. 3Michigan Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API