Legal Opinion

City of Grand Rapids v. Blakely

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1879PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to the Superior Court of Grand Rapids. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Blakeley brought assumpsit for money had and received to recover back a sum of money alleged to have been illegally claimed and collected as a special tax for a street improvement in the city. He obtained judgment in the Superior Court and the city brought error.

The question is raised that a large part of the amount adjudged against the city was in fact paid some time after the warrant for collection had run out, and as a consequence that the payment should be held a voluntary one. This point is not authorized by the record. In submitting the ease the judge distinctly assumed that the tax was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Warren v. City of Grand HavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Schlesinger v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. In Re the Appraisal Under the Transfer Tax Act of the Trust Estate Held for the Life of O'BerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Harry B. Helmsley v. City of Detroit, Michigan, a Municipal Corporation of the State of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  5. Eaton v. BennettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API