Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Butler

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 19, 1965No. 4023PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

A. J. Hamilton and others, nephews and nieces and grandnephews and grandnieces of T. R. Rhodes, deceased, sued Lela Kate Butler alleging they were the heirs at law of T. R. Rhodes, and as such entitled to recover S3 per cent of his estate. Mrs. Butler’s claim to said property was based upon the following established facts: T. R. Rhodes died intestate in 1963. He left no surviving wife or child. His only child who survived infancy was Forrest E. Rhodes. Forrest E. Rhodes and wife, in 1925, executed, acknowledged and filed for record a written statement adopting Lela Kate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heien v. CrabtreeTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Martinez v. GutierrezTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Hoch v. HochTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Asbeck v. AsbeckTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Rothman v. GillettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dye v. BattlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Wheeler v. MyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API