Legal Opinion
McFadden v. City of Bridgeport
District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Decided March 20, 2006No. Civ.A. 1:04CV225PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KEELEY, District Judge.
The question presented in this case is whether provisions of the defendant, City of Bridgeport’s (Bridgeport), sign ordinance, Article 1325 of the Codified Ordinances of Bridgeport (the Ordinance), violate the First Amendment. The plaintiff, Daniel McFadden (McFadden), challenges the constitutionality of Sections 1325.07 and 1325.13 of the Ordinance on free speech grounds. Section 1325.07 prohibits the posting of “temporary” and “political” signs within city limits more than thirty (30) days before and forty-eight (48) hours after the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marin v. Town of SoutheastDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Quinly v. CITY OF PRAIRIE VILLAGE KAN.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Bell v. Baltimore County, MDDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008