State v. Vines
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
INMAN, Judge.
Defendant Dennis Ray Vines ("Defendant") appeals his convictions following jury verdicts finding him guilty of attempted first-degree forcible rape and first-degree forcible sexual offense. Defendant argues that the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion to dismiss the sexual offense charge because the State produced insufficient evidence that a taser was a dangerous weapon; and (2) refusing to instruct the jury on voluntary intoxication to negate the specific intent element of the attempted rape charge. After careful review of the record and applicable law, we hold that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Presnell v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. MashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. TorainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. DaughtrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. MoneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
- State v. MoneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020