Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Sherman v. Almeida

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 22, 2000No. 98-157-AppealPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*471OPINION

GOLDBERG, Justice.

This appeal arose from the criminal activity of former Superior Court Justice Antonio S. Almeida (Almeida), who, while presiding over supplementary proceedings involving a man who was incapacitated and incapable of protecting his own interests, acted in a manner that was corrupt and reprehensible, and represents a dark hour in the history of the Superior Court. A civil action based upon this corrupt conduct and the unscrupulous behavior of other equally nefarious individuals was instituted on February 27, 1992, by the plaintiff, the estate of Paul K. Sherman, against…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. McKenna v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  2. Narragansett Electric Co. v. MinardiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  3. Toste Farm Corp. v. Hadbury, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  4. Elizabeth Boyer v. Chief Judge Haiganush BedrosianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  5. Pellegrino v. Rhode Island Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API