Legal Opinion
B. Bornstein & Son, Inc. v. R. H. MacY & Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 25, 1980No. 2198, 2220PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order entering summary judgment and directing the pro-rata distribution of funds in the court’s possession.
This action has its origins in a contract between B. Born-stein and Son, Inc., a construction company, and Springpenn Properties Corp., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of R.H. Macy and Company, Inc., for the construction of a Bamberger’s department store in Delaware County. When the store was completed, there remained due a contract balance of $147,396.00. Under the terms of the contract, Bornstein could not receive this balance until it…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- SPIRES Et Ux. v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Gee v. EberleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Jacobs v. Northeastern Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gee v. EberleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Sound of Market Street, Inc. v. Continental Bank InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Hall v. Goodman Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- In the Matter of Gebco Investment Corporation, Creative Development Corporation, Plaza Development Corporation, Fidelity Loan and Investment Corporation and Meadowlands Inn, Debtors. Appeal of Monroeville Electronics CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- In re Gebco Investment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.