Legal Opinion

Benham v. State ex rel. Richardson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1883No. 9627PublishedCited by 9 opinions

From the Ripley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Best, C.

— This was a prosecution for bastardy. Judgment for the State. A motion-for a new trial was overruled, and this ruling is assigned as error. This motion embraced many reasons, none of which need be noticed, except the ruling of the court in refusing to allow the defendant to ask the relatrix, upon cross-examination, whether she had had sexual intercourse with other persons between certain dates near the time when the child was begotten. The child wTas born on the 22d day of February, 1881, and the testimony strongly tended to show that it was a well developed and fully matured child…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker v. State ex rel. CorbinIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
  2. O'Brian v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Hill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beaman v. HedrickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Stoppert v. NierleNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Dehler v. State ex rel. BierckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Robnett v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1885
  5. E-. F-. v. G-. H-.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API