Henry v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
The points on appeal in this criminal case made by both appellants, Willis Clay Henry and Oliver Franklin Henry, have been duly considered with the result that only one assignment of error is deemed to present a serious issue. We think that no reversible error was committed by the district court in the admission of evidence or in overruling appellants’ respective motions for directed verdicts; that the verdict of the jury was not contrary to the law and the évidence; and that no reversible error inheres in the refusal of the trial court to grant the special requests…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Little v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Nigro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. John Charles BlankenshipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- People v. OlsenNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Commonwealth v. MandevilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Dolores M. Moran, of the Estate of Edward P. Moran, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.