Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 6, 2000No. 25166PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINNEY, Chief Justice:

This case is before the Court on a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ decision in State v. Mitchell, 332 S.C. 619, 506 S.E.2d 523 (Ct.App.1998). We affirm, finding as did the Court of Appeals that respondent was entitled to a directed verdict on the burglary charge.

DISCUSSION

A person is guilty of burglary in the first degree if he enters a dwelling without consent and with intent to commit a crime in the dwelling, and at least one of three aggravating factors is proven. S.C.Code Ann. § 16-11-311 (Supp.1999). Section 16-11-311(A)(2) lists one of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. SchrockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. ChildsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. State v. GripponSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. MartinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. CherrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. McHoneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. CurtisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. BuckmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API