Legal Opinion

Manning v. Dial

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 5, 1978No. 20703PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This action for fraud and deceit was brought by respondent Manning against appellant Dial in connection with a stock sale. Upon a trial by jury, Manning was awarded $23,750.00 actual damages and $125,000.00 punitive damages. We affirm.

Prior to the difficulties which precipitated this law suit, the parties enjoyed a longstanding personal and business relationship, and engaged in extensive joint real estate development. In the early 1960’s they began development of the Woodland Hills Subdivision near Columbia. In 1965 the parties formed Woodland Utilities, Inc. to operate the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. YaschikSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  2. Lawson v. Citizens & Southern National Bank Ex Rel. Will of ClevelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  3. Gilbert v. Mid-South MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  4. Dickard v. MerrittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  5. Athanas v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Regions Bank v. SchmauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Bragg v. Hi-Ranger, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Keaton Ex Rel. Foster v. GREENVILLE HOSP.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Russell v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Ellie, Inc. v. MiccichiCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API