Legal Opinion

Bachynsky v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 11, 1988No. 05-86-00959-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HECHT, Justice.

Dr. Nicholas Bachynsky and the Physician’s Clinic of Dallas, Inc. (“the Clinic”) appeal from the district court’s assessment against each of them of the maximum $50,-000 civil penalty authorized by the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices — Consumer Protection Act1 for 106 separate violations of a permanent injunction issued under that Act. We hold that the district court’s findings of so many violations are based upon a misconstruction of the injunction. Viewing the record in light of a proper reading of the injunction, indulging every inference in favor of the State, we find…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Commercial Credit Corp. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  5. First National Bank in Canyon v. GambleTexas Supreme Court · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BachynskyTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Dana Howell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995
  3. T.C.& C. Real Estate Holding, Inc. v. Danny R. Sherrod and Wife, Wendy Sherrod, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
  4. in the Guardianship of Vassil v. Tchokoev, an Incapacitated Person, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API