Legal Opinion
State v. Bachynsky
Texas Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 1989No. C-7524PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COOK, Justice.
The State of Texas brings this action against Dr. Nicholas Bachynsky and the Physicians’ Clinic of Dallas, Inc. (“the Clinic”) seeking civil penalties for violations of a permanent injunction issued under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (DTPA), Tex.Bus. & Comm.Code Ann. §§ 17.41-.63 (Vernon 1987). After finding 106 violations of the permanent injunction, the district court assessed the maximum civil penalty of $50,-000 authorized by the DTPA against both Bachynsky and the Clinic. The court of appeals reversed and rendered judgment in favor of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Holley v. WattsTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Cook v. HamerTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Beck v. SheppardTexas Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- C. Michael Lucas v. James Jolly Clark & Eonic Creations Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- Dana Howell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995
- Hebert Acquisitions, LLC v. Tremur Consulting Contractors, Inc. Chris R. Murray And San Juanita Murray, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- T.C.& C. Real Estate Holding, Inc. v. Danny R. Sherrod and Wife, Wendy Sherrod, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
- in the Guardianship of Vassil v. Tchokoev, an Incapacitated Person, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2022