Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Hertz Corporation

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided October 28, 2019No. 2:19-cv-12114Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA QUINISHA B. LAWRENCE, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff VERSUS NO. 19-12114 HERTZ CORPORATION, ET AL., SECTION "E" (1) Defendants ORDER AND REASONS Before the Court is a Motion to for Leave to File First Supplemental and Amending Complaint1 and a Motion to Remand,2 both filed by Plaintiff Quinisha Lawrence. Defendants The Hertz Corporation and Hertz Local Edition Corporation oppose both motions.3 Due to the interrelated nature of the motions, the Court considers both motions simultaneously. For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s motions are…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  5. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API