Ihihi v. Kahaulelio
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii. Action by David K. Kahaulelio against Beke Ihihi and another. A judgment for plaintiff was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Hawaii, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The defendant in error, as the heir at law of Isaac Ihihi, brought an action in the circuit court for the territory of Hawaii to recover possession of certain real estate, claiming title thereto under a deed executed in the Plawaiian language, translated as follows:
Know all men by these presents, I, Beke Ihihi of Lahaina, county of Maui, for one dollar ($1.00) by me received from Isaac Iliihi, my beloved nephew, of the city and county of Honolulu, territory of Hawaii, and also for my love for *818him, hereby sell and convey to him and to his heirs and assigns forever, my…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Turner v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
- Wilson v. CarricoIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Leaver v. GaussSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Bassett v. BudlongMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Hunt v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ako v. RussellHawaii Supreme Court · 1933
- Sablan v. IginoefSupreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands · 1990