Legal Opinion

McIlvaine Patent Corporation v. Walgreen Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 20, 1943No. 8121PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment declaring Claim 5 of Patent No. 2,040,753 issued to Mcllvaine May 12, 1936, 1 and Claim 1 of Patent No. 2,060,584 to the same patentee, issued November 10, 1936, 2 invalid and, if valid, not infringed.

Invention is asserted upon a combination, all the elements of which are admittedly old except one — in the first patent, the element “electrostatic shields surrounding” the electrodes “and spaced therefrom and positioned within the container to receive and maintain a negative charge whereby the cathode glow is confined inside said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. Brooklyn Wood Heel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  4. Allegheny County v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  5. Moline Plow Co. v. Rock Island Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Busam Motor Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  2. Blanc v. Spartan Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  3. Popeil Brothers, Inc. v. Schick Electric, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
  4. Crusade v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. General Steel Products Company v. LorenzDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API