McIlvaine Patent Corporation v. Walgreen Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment declaring Claim 5 of Patent No. 2,040,753 issued to Mcllvaine May 12, 1936, 1 and Claim 1 of Patent No. 2,060,584 to the same patentee, issued November 10, 1936, 2 invalid and, if valid, not infringed.
Invention is asserted upon a combination, all the elements of which are admittedly old except one — in the first patent, the element “electrostatic shields surrounding” the electrodes “and spaced therefrom and positioned within the container to receive and maintain a negative charge whereby the cathode glow is confined inside said…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. Brooklyn Wood Heel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Allegheny County v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Moline Plow Co. v. Rock Island Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. Busam Motor Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Blanc v. Spartan Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Popeil Brothers, Inc. v. Schick Electric, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
- Crusade v. Capital Transit Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- General Steel Products Company v. LorenzDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.