Legal Opinion

Riley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 6, 1923No. 7724PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The conviction is for murder; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of twenty-five years.

The document found in the record denominated a statement of facts is without the approval of the trial judge. Authentication of the statement of facts by the judge who presides at the trial is essential to authorize its consideration on appeal. The statute requires this and many cases in point are found in Vernon’s Texas Crim. Stat., Vol. 2, page 819, note 22.

There are several bills of exceptions, one of which relates to the overruling- of the second…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cordova & Co. v. PriestlyTexas Supreme Court · 1849

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chapman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Womack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API