Legal Opinion

Neigut v. Kearney

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided December 15, 1954No. Civ. No. 1826PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEEHY, Chief Judge.

Petitioner, who is presently confined in the Federal Correctional Institution at Texarkana, Texas, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum. Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss said petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that this Court, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, is without authority or jurisdiction to entertain said petition because it does not appear that a motion to vacate judgment and sentence filed with the sentencing court is inadequate and ineffective to test the legality of petitioner’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pyramid Motor Freight Corp. v. IspassSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Decatur v. HiattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  3. Holloway v. LooneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  4. Tacoma v. Hiatt, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  5. Barbee v. Capital Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McMunn v. Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. Tyler Armes v. Austin Richard PostDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API