Neigut v. Kearney
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
SHEEHY, Chief Judge.
Petitioner, who is presently confined in the Federal Correctional Institution at Texarkana, Texas, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum. Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss said petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that this Court, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, is without authority or jurisdiction to entertain said petition because it does not appear that a motion to vacate judgment and sentence filed with the sentencing court is inadequate and ineffective to test the legality of petitioner’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pyramid Motor Freight Corp. v. IspassSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Decatur v. HiattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Holloway v. LooneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Tacoma v. Hiatt, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
- Barbee v. Capital Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- McMunn v. Babcock & Wilcox Power Generation Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Tyler Armes v. Austin Richard PostDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022