Legal Opinion

Decatur v. Hiatt

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 20, 1950No. 13132PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

In his petition for habeas corpus for release from confinement,- appellant alleged that he had applied by motion for relief under Sec. 2255, 28 U.S.C.A., but he did not show that he had prosecuted the motion with effect. Neither did he show that such remedy by motion was “inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention”. Notwithstanding this failure and the fact that the record showed that the motion under Sec. 2255 had been denied, the district judge entertained his petition and heard and considered his claim that he was entitled to release on habeas corpus because his plea…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States of America Ex Rel. John McGrath v. J. E. Lavallee, Warden of Clinton Prison, Dannemora, New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. Jones v. SquierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  3. Stiltner v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1965
  4. Charles Kimbrough v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  5. Joe Tubbs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API