Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Engroff

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 28, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

At the trial of this case there was presented a substantial issue related to the admissibility of certain parol evidence. This evidence was designed to establish the location of an iron stake marking the terminal point of the second course of the land conveyed by the deed out of which the controversy arose. -The trial court received the proof subject to a later determination of its competency. At the conclusion of the matter he decided that it was not admissible, but, because the precise problem had not been passed upon in the appellate courts, he wisely undertook to dispose of the merits of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Resurrection Gold Min. Co. v. Fortune Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  2. City of Warsaw v. SwearnginSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Dittrich v. UblSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Lee v. . BarefootSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Will v. PIPERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stransky v. Monmouth Council of Girl Scouts, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API