Legal Opinion

Williams v. Watson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 10, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Sampson

Affirm-

ing.

Appellant Williams and appellee Watson, with one O’Bear, were engaged in taking and selling oil and gas leases and in the oil business generally in 1919-1920. In the consolidation of some of their oil companies the Alakyla Oil Company gave its note to appellee Watson for thirty thousand ($30,000.00) dollars. Appellant Williams was president of the corporation. Before it became due and while the business was active, Williams and others conceived the idea of consolidating the Alakyla company with another, or other companies, and in order to satisfy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watson's Exr. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. L., H. & St. L. R. R. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Berry's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Gorman v. HuntKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Security Finance Co. v. Cook & SonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. A. Arnold & Son Transfer & Storage Co. v. WeisigerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Burkhart v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API