Legal Opinion

Van Winkle v. Hinckle

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Sixth Judicial District. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCope, J.

Norton, J. concurring.

This is an action to quiet the title to certain real estate in the city of Sacramento. The complaint alleges that the defendant is in possession as the tenant of the plaintiff, but disclaims the tenancy, and sets up an adverse title in himself. The judgment enjoins the defendant from asserting his title, and establishes that of the plaintiff.

We are of opinion that the judgment is erroneous, and that the action cannot be maintained. The statute provides that “ an action may be brought by any person in possession, by himself or his tenant, of real property, against any…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lyle v. RollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Hebden v. BinaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Ely v. New Mexico & Arizona RailroadArizona Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Tuell v. HomannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Klemesrud v. BlikreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API