Legal Opinion

Ely v. New Mexico & Arizona Railroad

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1888No. Civil No. 228PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a Judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. Wm. H. Barnes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, 0. J.

This was a suit in equity to quiet title. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the owner in fee of all the land described in the complaint, but does not allege that he is in possession; nor does it aver that he is entitled to possession, or ash that possession be awarded him. The land is described as a Mexican land grant, called the “Rancho San Jóse de Sonoita,” and situated in the Sonoita valley, county of Pima, territory of Arizona, and that it was granted by the Mexican authorities to one Leon Herreras on the 15th day of May, 1825. The complaint further describes the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Clark v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  3. Reynolds v. Crawfordsville First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Frost v. SpitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Swisshelm Gold Silver Co. v. FarwellArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Astiazaran v. Santa Rita Land & Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Howell v. BoyleOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Kessler v. The HartfordDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
  5. Melvin Williams, Jr. v. Ryan Thornell, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API