Legal Opinion
Freeling v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided November 20, 1962No. Civ. 9373PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIZLEY, District Judge.
The plaintiff brings this action against the defendant corporation to recover damages for alleged slanderous statements made by Royal Cobum, General Counsel for Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The statements were made in open court during litigation before the District Court of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma.
The plaintiff asserts that jurisdiction of the matter exists by virtue of Title 12 U.S.C.A. § 1819, which provides the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation with the authority to sue and be sued.
The defendant corporation has filed a motion to dismiss, challenging…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Doherty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Larry Dean Pearl and Denise Pearl, Both Minors, by Frances Laverne Pearl, Their Mother and Next Friend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- B.C. Morton International Corporation v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1962
3Cited by51 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Citizens Bank & Trust Company of Park Ridge, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation, Norman Scott v. Smithsonian InstitutionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation v. Howard B. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- First State Bank of Hudson County v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver of San Francisco National Bank v. David M. GlickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.