State v. Deptuch
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
In his petition for reconsideration, defendant persuades us that we erred when we stated that the error that he assigned to the giving of a jury instruction did not apply to his conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4)(b). He had also been convicted of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(1) (b), and unlawful possession of a weapon. ORS 166.250. On appeal, we reversed the conviction for conspiracy and affirmed the other two convictions. State v. Deptuch, 95 Or App 54, 767 P2d 471 (1989). We grant the petition, consider that assignment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. PaceOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. DeptuchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- State v. BauerOregon Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. MesenbrinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. AronsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. MorelliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.