National Surety Company v. . Stallo
New York Court of Appeals
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 26, 1917, affirming a judgment .in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury. The action was to recover premiums alleged to be due on two surety bonds.
Read the full summary
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 26, 1917, affirming a judgment .in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury. The action was to recover premiums alleged to be due on two surety bonds. The trial court held that the provision in the written contracts that the defendant should continue liable for premiums on the bonds until the plaintiffs should be furnished with competent written legal evidence of their discharge from liability, was not intended to apply to…
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. Harrisburg Trust Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
- Lattarulo v. National Surety Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1922