Legal Opinion

Lattarulo v. National Surety Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided June 15, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpiegelberg, J.

This is an action to recover a premium of $1,000 paid by the plaintiff to the defendant. The plaintiff applied to the commissioner of internal revenue for a permit to deal in non-beverage alcoholic liquor. Pursuant to section 6 of the National Prohibition Act, which authorized the federal prohibition com*155missioner to require a bond in such form and amount as he may prescribe to insure compliance with the terms of the permit, a departmental regulation was adopted whereby every applicant for a permit was required to submit a bond with the application, which bond had to be approved by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. People ex rel. Kasson v. RoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. First National Bank v. National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Jones v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Waddington v. United Insurance Co.New York Supreme Court · 1819

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kansas City College of Osteopathic Medicine v. Employers' Surplus Lines Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  2. Ratner's Dairy Restaurant, Inc. v. Milwaukee Mechanics' InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API