Elliott v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WILLSON, District Judge.
This is a Jones Act case. It came on for trial before a jury. At the conclusion of the presentation of the evidence, defendant moved the court for a directed verdict in its favor pursuant to Rule 50 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. The motion was orally granted from the bench. Based upon all of the evidence, the court was of the opinion that no negligence on the part of the defendant was shown which played any part, even the slightest, in producing plaintiff’s injury. It is believed that reasonable men could not differ on this point. There was simply…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Walker v. Lykes Bros. S.S. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Patton-Tully Transp. Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
- Gill v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
3Cited by7 opinions
- Robert Reinhart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Creppel v. J. W. Banta Towing, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1962
- Gunnip v. Warner Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- George H. Elliott v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Jussila v. Sause Bros. Ocean Towing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.