Legal Opinion

Brown v. Hansen

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1993No. A-91-1233PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Irwin, Judge.

This appeal challenges the propriety of the district court’s sustaining of a motion for new trial. The action, arising out of an automobile accident, was tried to a jury and resulted in a verdict in favor of the defendants-appellants, Todd C. Hansen and Charles Hansen. Plaintiff-appellee, Mary L. Brown, filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. The district court sustained her motion for a new trial.

Appellants claim that the district court erred in sustaining Brown’s motion for new trial and in overruling appellants’ motion to reopen motion for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cox v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  2. Commerce Savings Scottsbluff, Inc. v. F.H. Schafer Elevator, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Baker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Kumar v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Kane v. ParryConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sabrina W. v. WillmanNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Cunningham v. Leisure InnNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Johnson v. Ford New Holland, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Svehla v. Beverly EnterprisesNebraska Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Facilities Cost Mgmt. Group v. Otoe Cty. Sch. Dist.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API