Legal Opinion
Black v. Anheuser-Busch In Bev
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 16, 2016No. 14 Civ. 2693PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Sweet, District Judge.
Defendant Anheuser-Busch Distributors of New York, Inc. (“Defendant” or “An-heuser-Busch”), named in the caption as “Anheuser-Busch In Bev”, has moved pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 for summary judgment to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Randall Black (“Black” or the “Plaintiff’) of the remaining claim of breach of contract. Based upon the facts and conclusions set forth below, the Defendant’s motion is granted and the complaint is dismissed.
I. Prior Proceedings
On January 6, 2014, Plaintiff filed a complaint in the Supreme Court of the State of New York (the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jose GOENAGA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARCH OF DIMES BIRTH DEFECTS FOUNDATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ahmad v. White Plains City School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Barrett v. VillaltaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Belizario v. United Parcel Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Bledsoe v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Bolah v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT)District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.