Legal Opinion

Norris & Associates, Inc. v. GRM Industries, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided August 21, 1995No. 1:94-CV-692PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

McKEAGUE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint in this diversity action contains six counts: breach of the GRM agreement; quantum meruiVun-just enrichment; breach of settlement agreement; fraud; fraudulent conveyance; and piercing the corporate veil. Now before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment, requesting judgment only as to count I of the complaint, breach of the GRM agreement. Also before the Court is defendants’ cross-motion for partial summary judgment, requesting judgment not only as to count I, but also as to count II, quantum…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. James F. BARNHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PICKREL, SCHAEFFER & EBELING COMPANY, L.P.A., Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Monahan v. Finlandia UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API