Legal Opinion
Nixon Peabody LLP v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 2014No. B256871PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, P. J.
Petitioner Nixon Peabody LLP seeks a writ of mandate directing the trial court to set aside its order granting real parties in interest’s 1 motion to vacate their voluntary dismissal under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (d)* 2 on the ground that the dismissal was void. Petitioner argues the trial court erred in its finding. We agree with petitioner and issue the writ.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
The facts concerning the instant petition for writ are undisputed. In 2007, real parties in interest purchased interests in two Florida golf clubs. Petitioner…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Linsk v. LinskCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Cruz v. Fagor America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Whittier Union High School District v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Talley v. Valuation Counselors Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pittman v. Beck Park Apartments Ltd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Airs Aromatics, LLC v. CBL Data Recovery Techs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Airs Aromatics v. CBL Data Recovery TechnologiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Astra Pacific Outdoor v. Sipperley CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Braugh v. DowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.