Commonwealth v. Eggleston
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCowin, J.
“[W]hen an automobile is stopped in a public place with probable cause, no more exigent circumstances are required by art. 14 [of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights] beyond the inherent mobility of an automobile itself to justify a warrantless search of the vehicle.” Commonwealth v. Motta, 424 Mass. 117, 124 (1997). In this case, we conclude that this principle applies even when the police had ample opportunity to obtain a search warrant, provided that there has been no unreasonable delay.
*555Facts and proceedings. The essential facts are not disputed. Members of the Berkshire County drug…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Pennsylvania v. LabronSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Commonwealth v. CastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Commonwealth v. BongarzoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Robinson v. CookCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Commonwealth v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Commonwealth v. DanielMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. MartinezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.