Moran v. Smith
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On motions by defendant for new trial. These two cases, one by father and one by minor son, are brought to recover for injuries received by reason of a collision between the defendant’s automobile, driven by him, and Kenneth P. Moran. Plea, the general issue. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in both cases. Defendant filed motions for new trial in both cases. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSavage, C. J.
The plaintiff in the first action, a boy eight years old, seeks to recover damages for injuries occasioned by being run against and thrown down by an automobile negligently driven by the defendant. The other action is brought by the boy’s father to recover for alleged loss of services, and expenses of nursing. In each case the plaintiff recovered a verdict. And the cases are before us on defendant’s motions for new trials.
The collision occurred on Limerock street in Rockland, between Broad and Lincoln streets. These streets intersect Limerock street at right angles, and are seventy feet…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Hartley v. LasaterWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Webb-Pepploe v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
- Barlow v. LowerySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
- Crutchley v. BruceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Greene v. WilleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.