Mullen v. Zoning Hearing Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, Senior Judge.
The Borough of Collingdale (Borough) appeals a Delaware County Common Pleas Court order that sustained Leo Mullen’s appeal of a Borough Zoning Hearing Board (Board) decision and deemed his request for a zoning variance approved.
This case began when Mullen applied for a permit to construct a building on property at 96 Chester Pike, in an area zoned “B Residential” by the local zoning ordinance, for purposes of using the property as a used car sales lot and office. The Borough informed Mullen by letter that his application was denied because the ordinance did not permit him…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Limekiln Golf Course, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Horsham TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Heisterkamp v. ZHB, City of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Quality Food Markets, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Piecknick v. South Strabane Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Morgan v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Romesburg v. Fayette County Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- P. Helenski v. Upper Merion Twp. ZHBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Snyder Hardware Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County2008
- Wistuk v. Lower Mt. Bethel Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Wistuk v. Lower Mt. Bethel Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005