Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Zoning Hearing Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 4, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LORD, Senior Judge.

The Borough of Collingdale (Borough) appeals a Delaware County Common Pleas Court order that sustained Leo Mullen’s appeal of a Borough Zoning Hearing Board (Board) decision and deemed his request for a zoning variance approved.

This case began when Mullen applied for a permit to construct a building on property at 96 Chester Pike, in an area zoned “B Residential” by the local zoning ordinance, for purposes of using the property as a used car sales lot and office. The Borough informed Mullen by letter that his application was denied because the ordinance did not permit him…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Limekiln Golf Course, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Horsham TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Heisterkamp v. ZHB, City of LancasterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Quality Food Markets, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Piecknick v. South Strabane Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Morgan v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Romesburg v. Fayette County Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. P. Helenski v. Upper Merion Twp. ZHBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Snyder Hardware Inc. v. Zoning Hearing Board, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County2008
  4. Wistuk v. Lower Mt. Bethel Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Wistuk v. Lower Mt. Bethel Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API