Legal Opinion

Heisterkamp v. ZHB, City of Lancaster

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 1978No. Appeal, 429 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

The Appellant, Dr. Charles Heisterkamp, III, appeals here from a decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County affirming the denial by the Zoning Hearing Board of the City of Lancaster (Board) of his request for a variance. He operates a medical office and had requested a variance in order to construct additional waiting-room space by extending the front of his building five feet beyond the setback requirement imposed by the zoning ordinance.

A hearing was held before the Board on June 7, 1976 at which time the Appellant’s request for a variance was denied.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. East Lansdowne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Limekiln Golf Course, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Horsham TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Garchinsky v. Clifton Heights BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Cohen v. PHILA. ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Hess v. Upper Oxford TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Quality Food Markets, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Schaefer v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Vacca v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Glazer v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Pae v. Hilltown Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API