Legal Opinion
Hirschfeld v. Banner
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 20, 1978No. Civ. A. 75-1147PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, * Chief Judge.
Findings of Fact
1. Plaintiffs Tomas Hirschfeld, Marvin Margoshes, and Block Engineering, Inc. brought this action under 35 U.S.C. § 145, seeking to have this court authorize defendant Donald W. Banner, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, to issue a patent containing claims 12, 13, and 15, the only claims at issue in plaintiffs’ application entitled “Digitally Controlled Electro-Optical Imaging System,” serial No. 117,285, filed February 22, 1971. The inventors are Tomas Hirschfeld and Marvin Margoshes. The application is assigned to Block Engineering, Inc.
2. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gottschalk v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parker v. FlookSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In re FreemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- California Research Corporation v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Monsanto Company v. KampDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Raytheon Company, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Roper Corporation, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Gordon Gould v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Hirschfeld v. BannerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Synthetic Industries (Texas), Inc. v. Forta Fibre Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1984