Legal Opinion

Supreme Court of Virginia v. Friedman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 20, 1988No. 87-399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

487 U.S. 59 (1988)

SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA ET AL.

v.

FRIEDMAN

No. 87-399.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 21, 1988

Decided June 20, 1988

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Gregory E. Lucyk, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Mary Sue Terry, Attorney General, Gail Starling Marshall, Deputy Attorney General, and William H. Hauser, Senior Assistant Attorney General.

Cornish F. Hitchcock argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief were Alan B. Morrison and John J. McLaughlin.[*]

Briefs…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Kennedy; Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Supreme Court of NH v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United Building & Constr. Trades Council of Camden Cty. v. Mayor and Council of CamdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kevin Marilley v. Charlton BonhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Kevin Marilley v. Charlton BonhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Kevin Marilley v. Charlton BonhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API