Daniel Brian Atkins v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARTHA HILL JAMISON, Justice.
In two issues, appellant Daniel Brian Atkins appeals his conviction for capital murder, complaining that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish the victim’s identity and asserting that Penal Code sections 19.02(b) and 19.03 violate due process under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. We affirm.
Background
On September 7, 2010, two officers received a call regarding the disappearance of a trailer-home resident, Franklin McCown, who had not been seen for four to five days. The officers entered the residence and found a man’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Malik v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Michael Manahan, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2014
- Pedro Garcia, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2019
- Randy Nunez Masson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Russell Singleton Leonard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2016