Legal Opinion

State v. Harding

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2011No. 20100291PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice PARRISH,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

T 1 The sole question before us is whether a police officer may search two backpacks belonging to a passenger in an automobile after receiving only the driver's consent to search the vehicle. The district court's factual findings are not sufficiently particularized for us to conclusively make this determination. We therefore remand with instructions for the district court to make additional factual findings.

BACKGROUND

1 2 Tina Harding was one of three passengers in a vehicle that was stopped by Officer Jeffrey Westerman on February 22, 2008.…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Kentucky v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. MetUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. Carter v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. D.B. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Lopez v. United Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API