State v. Vahl
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
Patricia Vahl was convicted of driving while adjudged an habitual traffic offender. She contends her conviction is invalid because, although notice of revocation was sent by certified mail, it was returned unclaimed. The Superior Court held that notice by certified mail satisfied the habitual traffic offender statute.
Facts
The Department of Licensing sent Vahl notice by certified mail that she was an habitual offender and that her license would be revoked for 5 years as of July 15, 1984. An habitual traffic offender is anyone who accumulates three or more specified convictions within a 5-year…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Nielsen v. BralandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- State v. DarnellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. DolsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. DolsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- In Re Marriage of McLeanWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- In re the Marriage of McLeanWashington Supreme Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.