Legal Opinion

Haworth, Inc. v. Herman Miller, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided February 9, 1994No. 1:92:CV:877PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ENSLEN, District Judge.

The matter before the Court is defendant Herman Miller, Inc.’s (“HMI”) motion for summary judgment of laches. The standard for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56 is well-known, and I will not repeat it here.

Plaintiff (“Haworth”) and defendant HMI both manufacture furniture. Plaintiffs complaint alleges that defendant infringed two of its patents. The alleged improvement in each claim is directed to specific arrangements for prewired electrical outlets and receptacles in moveable wall panels.

Defendant’s present motion asks the Court to order that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Vaupel Textilmaschinen Kg and Vaupel North America v. Meccanica Euro Italia S.P.A. And American Trim Products, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. Jamesbury Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. R2 Medical Systems, Inc. v. Katecho, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  2. Parameter Driven Software, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bay Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen International Distribution Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API