Clary v. Borrell
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHuff, J.
Jeffrey S. Clary and TUG Properties, LLC (TUG) instituted this action against Clifton David Borrell for breach of contract and quantum meruit, wherein Clary and TUG asserted Borrell breached the TUG operating agreement entered into by Clary and Borrell. From an order of the trial court granting Borrell summary judgment on both claims, Clary appeals the grant of summary judgment on the breach of contract cause of action. Specifically, Clary contends the court erred in (1) finding there was no genuine issue of material fact in controversy, as Clary provided evidence Borrell signed a statement…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- George v. FabriSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- David v. McLeod Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Dawkins v. FieldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Park Regency, LLC v. R & D Development of the CarolinasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
- Rogers v. RowlandDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2022