Carmon v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtMullins, J.
*358 The petitioner, Adam Carmon, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court, dismissing in part and denying in part, his fourth petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court improperly concluded that he failed to establish that (1) the state had violated Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 215 (1963), by withholding critical exculpatory evidence at the time of his criminal trial, (2) his criminal trial counsel, first habeas counsel, and second habeas counsel all had provided ineffective assistance, and (3) he was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Miller v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. SimmsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McClain v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Outing v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Antonio A. v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021