Legal Opinion
City of Kansas City v. Manfield
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 1996No. WD 50850PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMART, Judge.
Auditorium Bar & Grill, Inc. (“Auditorium Bar”) rented business property from Eugene Manfield for the purpose of operating a bar and grill. The lease provided that the tenant would not share in the proceeds of an condemnation award for the taking of the real property. When it appeared the premises would by condemned by the City of Kansas City, Missouri (“City”) so that the City could construct another facility on the premises, Auditorium Bar decided to arrange with Manfield to purchase from Manfield the property’s heating and air conditioning systems and walk-in cooler, hoping to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. BriggsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- Missouri Public Service Company v. ArgenbrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Western Robidoux Printing & Lithographing Co. v. Missouri State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. SamborskiSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Jim Lynch Toyota, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- South Carolina Department of Transportation v. M & T Enterprises of Mt. Pleasant, LLC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Manfield v. Auditorium Bar & Grill, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- City of Brentwood v. Barron Holdings International, Ltd.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- City of Roeland Park v. Jasan TrustSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State ex rel. Missouri Highways & Transportation Commission v. MusletMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.