Legal Opinion
Kuhn v. King
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 1951No. Docket 21, Calendar 44,921PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBtttzel, J.
The plaintiff, Bichard Kuhn, worked at the Lincoln Motor Company in Detroit and lived in Wayne, Michigan. On September 30, 1948, after finishing his work for the day, he met one Edwards,' a fellow worker, who offered to drive him to the Wayne bus line after he made a business call at the Club Vogue, a saloon in Inkster, Michigan.
The Club Vogue, owned by the defendant, Gardner King, is situated in a building on the west side of Middlebelt road. Its overall dimensions are 40 feet wide and 80 feet deep. -The bar is along.the north wall, starting some 15 feet from the east side of the building.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McRickard v. . FlintNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Evans v. OrttenburgerMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Johnson v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Dahlerup v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Christensen v. James S. Hannon, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Torma v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Budman v. SkoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Muth v. W. P. Lahey's, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Uren v. TothMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
- Sherryl Ann Kelly v. Alan Bernard GrohowskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019