Legal Opinion

Bidwell v. Madison

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1865PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The complaint in this action states that the Plaintiffs were co-partners engaged in a general banking and exchange business under the firm name and style of Bidwell’s Exchange Bank, at St. Paul, during and prior to' the month of May, 1859, to and until about the first day of May, 1858. That on or about the 21st day of April, 1856, the Plaintiffs and Defendant entered into an agreement in writing, by the provisions of which the parties thereto were to become co-partners in…

Read the full summary

The complaint in this action states that the Plaintiffs were co-partners engaged in a general banking and exchange business under the firm name and style of Bidwell’s Exchange Bank, at St. Paul, during and prior to' the month of May, 1859, to and until about the first day of May, 1858. That on or about the 21st day of April, 1856, the Plaintiffs and Defendant entered into an agreement in writing, by the provisions of which the parties thereto were to become co-partners in such business for one year, under said firm name, unless the Defendant should thereafter, or at the expiration of such…

1Opinion of the Court

Dy the Court —

Berry, J. —

It is not necessary to determine in this case what were the relations of the parties to this action to third persons, so that we are not embarrassed by any of the difficulties which might present themselves were we considering the ques*20tion of partnership or no partnership in reference to outsiders. We have only to decide upon the mutual rights and liabilities of the parties to thi§ action as between themselves. The Defendants in error allege in their complaint that they were partners under the style of Bicfwell’s Exchange Bank. This allegation is denied by the answer.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. D. Morrison & Co. v. LovejoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
  2. Cady v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1859

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wojahn v. HalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Inhabitants of Bloomfield v. Mayor of Glen RidgeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1897
  3. Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API